It’s said that the difference between men and boys is the price of their toys. True enough. A benefit of adulthood is that, if you’re lucky, you can splurge on stuff you dreamed of as a child. For me, a boyish passion was remote sensing and control. When you’re small and powerless, you feel bigger and empowered to monitor and control things from afar, even if “afar” is just a few feet away. So, before I began fooling with phones and multi frequency switching systems as an adolescent, I was a grade schooler stringing, first real string, then wires and finally transmitters and receivers to turn things on and off and monitor my little world.
Most of these I built, some I bought (or, more accurately, I received as gifts from my indulgent parents). I vividly remember the Sonuswitch from the venerable Hammacher Schlemmer store on East 57th Street in Manhattan, a boxy black and gold brick that turned on lights with two hand claps or by jingling keys.
The ’60s were a Golden Age for the electronics tinkerer. Radio Shack then sold aisle-after-aisle of bright red Science Fair electronics kits and thousands of discrete components (what transistors, resistors, and capacitors are called to distinguish them from integrated circuits or “chips”). In 1967, I’d venture down to Canal Street and cruise blocks of surplus electronic outlets selling “space age” government surplus componentry or drool over the wares at the long gone Lafayette Radio Electronics and Heathkit stores on West 45th Street. Lafayette is where I got an FM transmitter that allowed me to broadcast to a vacant corner of the FM dial and the Big Ear, a giant orange parabolic microphone that promised the ability to listen to distant whispered conversations.
I’ve tread memory lane with a purpose: to talk about the latest manifestation of my childhood longings for remote monitoring and control and what they signal with respect to e-discovery. Today, we are entering a Golden Age of remote sensing and control for the masses. Internet-enabled cameras monitor my home, and lights and door locks answer to apps on my iPhone. My lightbulbs talk to the network and adjust brightness and hue on command. My thermostat let’s me tweak energy usage from aloft when I’ve forgotten to do it before heading to the airport.
And the most exciting development in my nerd’s paradise is the ability to control much of it by speaking to the new woman in my life, Alexa, the e-persona of my Amazon Echo and Dot devices.
I have my buddy Ernie the Attorney Svenson to thank for introducing me to Alexa. In Ernie’s lovely Uptown New Orleans home, Alexa’s sleek, black cylinder holds a prominent place in the living room. From the first moment Alexa and I spoke, I knew I had to have her. And have her, I did. I’ve had her in my bedroom, my bathroom, kitchen and living room, in my places in Austin and New Orleans. Oh, Alexa, is there anything you won’t do for me?
Now, stop. It’s not like that. Alexa streams music, and news updates. Checks the weather and traffic. Orders pizzas and Ubers. Keeps up with the grocery and to do lists. Tells jokes. Turns on the lights. Adjusts the temperature. Answers questions. Does math. Wakes me up. Reminds me of appointments. She also orders stuff from Amazon (big surprise there).
The best part is that all of this is accomplished by speaking to Alexa–hands free–in a pretty natural way and from a fair distance, even when she’s playing music or chattering away. “Hands free” is key. Activating a mobile agent like Siri is inconvenient enough to keep me from, say, putting shaving cream on the shopping list while I’m shaving. Plus, I can say, “Alexa, turn on the kitchen lights” without fumbling for a phone and opening an app.
Alexa plays nice with application development platforms like If This Then That (IFTTT); so, if Amazon hasn’t taught Alexa how to control something, someone else probably has, or I can do it myself. In marked contrast to Yours Truly, Alexa is getting smarter and more capable all the time, because the hardware in my home is just a conduit to Alexa’s malleable brain in the Amazon cloud.
I’ve lately ordered more Alexa manifestations in the form of the new Amazon Echo Dot, a hockey puck-sized version that eschews high fidelity for ubiquity. The Dot will go wherever I don’t need the big sound of the more expensive Echo or already have a sound system to which the Dot can connect by wire or Bluetooth. The goal is that Alexa always be in earshot.
So, Alexa will always be listening. To be fair, Alexa only transmits and records what she hears when I call her name. But, as she becomes an omnipresent interface to everything, Alexa will know an awful lot about my activities and interests. She records every interaction, including an audio recording of the person issuing instructions. Trust me, those audio records are handy when you find, “Buy heroin and bunny slippers” on your shopping list after leaving friends alone in the kitchen with Alexa.
Using the Alexa app on my phone or computer, I can view a list of every interaction since Alexa first came into my life, and listen to each recording of the instruction, including background sounds. You may call this “creepy.” I call it “evidence.”
As a lawyer and forensic examiner, I’m tickled pink that these new technologies bring with them a plethora of precise, objective evidence. Never in the course of human history have we had so much precise, probative and objective evidence about human thinking and behavior. Viewed the right way, more digital evidence should inspire and empower lawyers, not frustrate and intimidate them.
My childhood gadgets were stone tools compared to the Internet of Things and wireless devices today. But, the old stuff left hardly a trace. By contrast, Amazon’s Alexa (and Apple’s Siri and Microsoft’s Cortana) are voluble, vigilant witnesses dutifully recording the mundane, profane and probative of our lives.
But, what they don’t do is make it easy to preserve and collect their digital archives when a legal duty arises. Too many apps and social networking sites fail to offer a reasonable means by which to lock down or retrieve the extensive, detailed records they hold. True, I can access each of thousands of interactions with Alexa and listen to the recording of the command. One-by-one. From the standpoint of spoliation, the Alexa app allows commands to be selectively deleted from a user’s history and the entire history to be purged; but, insofar as preserving the history when it’s potential evidence, Alexa is deaf and dumb.
It’s all just data in a database in the Cloud; so, Amazon has a means to collect and produce it when the government comes calling in criminal matters. Yet, for those tilling the fields of civil justice, it’s unlikely that a subpoena will prompt more than a form denial. Diligent account holders have no self-directed mechanism to download a delimited (e.g., spreadsheet-compatible) copy of their data, the only option being an untenable screen-by-screen capture of data, coupled with recording the audio on some other device. I wouldn’t wish that on anyone. Even billing by the hour, it sucks.
Both the user communities and the legal community need to speak out on this. Users need an effective, self-directed means to preserve and collect their own data when legal and regulatory duties require it. Google has an excellent take-out mechanism. Twitter does, too. Facebook…well, Google and Twitter are good. Most app and service providers offer nothing at all.
Listen, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and all the other companies collecting vast volumes of our data through intelligent agents, apps and social networking sites, you must afford us a ready means to see and repatriate our data. It’s not enough to let us grab snatches via an unwieldy item-by-item interface. We have legal duties to meet, and if you wish to be partners in our digital lives, you must afford us reasonable means by which we can comply with the law when we anticipate litigation or respond to discovery. You owe us that. Alexa, are you listening?
[Dear Reader, if you’ve found better solutions for collecting from Alexa, I hope you’ll please share them here in Comments so all readers might benefit. I can’t. See, I called Alexa “Siri” by mistake, and now neither of them are talking to me. Digital women: you can’t live with them, you can’t download their data.]
–
–
–
–
-!
Andy Wilson (Logik) said:
Alexa arrives at my house tomorrow. Excited!
Craig, good to see you blogging again. I loved this post. As your writing indicates, the Cloud introduces new challenges and opportunities for e-discovery. This is the main thesis for why we built Logikcull: as more data moves to the Cloud, so too does the discoverable data. The problems are 100x more complicated than mining a PST of emails and attachments.
LikeLike
Rob Robinson said:
Excellent article Craig. As more and more data resides in the Cloud, I think there will also be increased discussion amongst eDiscovery professionals as to the security of the different approaches to storing data in the Cloud. All Cloud storage approaches are not the same, so it will be interesting to follow Cloud security discussions about the differences between offerings ranging from Logikcull to CloudNine. Do providers rely solely on the public Cloud? Do they have a private or protected Cloud where they can tell you at any time the exact physical location of data? Interesting questions and appreciate your writings as they increase awareness in these important areas.
LikeLike
Dixon Robertson said:
Science Fair kits? Damn, Craig, you’re old.
LikeLike
Ovin said:
Enjoyable article – the reality for technology companies, however, is that when they are developing new products, the unknowns are enormous: is there a product-market it? If not, what changes are needed? What bugs are present? How can we scale? All of those things need to be understood and tackled as soon as possible, or else the product will fall flat.
Most private app manufacturers don’t have the time, resources, or know-how to surface content in a way lawyers want.
As lawyers, we are totally self-interested in solving our own problems first. But for product teams, listening to what lawyers want ahead of the other 99% of customers spells death for the product. As a result, ediscovery capabilities end up far down the list and are not a realistic priority until late in the product maturity cycle.
LikeLike
craigball said:
I appreciate the comment but disagree with the premise of affording developers a free pass based on expediency. I didn’t –and don’t–suggest that developers let lawyers call the tune. This is a user rights issue. The ability to let users access their own data must be as key to a development path as data security. It’s essential in jurisdictions (EU) where users have the legal right to verify the accuracy of PII. Too, portability of data is important for reasons having nothing to do with what lawyers need. Again, not about the lawyers. ALL about the users.
LikeLike
Pingback: “Alexa. Preserve ESI.” | @ComplexD
Pingback: Craig Ball’s “Alexa-lent” Example of How the Internet of Things is Affecting Our Lives: eDiscovery Trends | eDiscoveryDaily
Allison Goodman said:
They may not be talking, but they are still listening. It isn’t a coincidence they all have female names… 🙂
LikeLike
Matthew Golab said:
Fascinating, Craig. Particularly in say criminal matters, if for example you are robbed and Alexa is able to overhear voices. Of course they’re not going to engage Alexa by saying her name first, however I wonder if there is any logging going on for just normal voice?
LikeLike
craigball said:
There is no voice logging until the activation word is spoken (currently either “Alexa” or “Amazon” at the user’s option). This is a key security feature. The ability to recognize the activation word is locally enabled, whereas other voice recognition capabilities are handled in the Cloud. Ostensibly, nothing is transmitted to the cloud until the activation word is spoken to “wake” the Echo.
LikeLike
Pingback: Some Artificial Intelligence fun: Amazon’s Alexa speech recognition, preserving ESI … and the new platforms – Gregory Bufithis
Pingback: Echos of Police, Privacy and Alexa – druglawyer12u
Pingback: Echos of Police, Privacy and Alexa | danile207
Pingback: Echos of Police, Privacy and Alexa – adamgeti23
Pingback: Echos of Police, Privacy and Alexa | sharon2o16
Pingback: Preserving Alexa History: Ugly-but-Easy | Ball in your Court
Pingback: Cloud Takeouts: Can I Get That to Go? | Ball in your Court